Skip to main content

How did the British win the Battle of Britain?

How did the British win the Battle of Britain? It was looking extremely tentative at first. The Luftwaffe was sending wave after wave of bombers that were focused on air fields and radar stations which really wore the British down. The air fields were caught unprepared taking heavy losses with one big issue being the advanced warning systems to allow for the pilots to get into the air to defend against the bombers. It was really tight for a while where the British had a hard time getting planes into the air fast enough and getting them assembled fast enough in order to be able to replace the losses that were taken in the beginning of the battle. Due to the Nazis having near air superiority over Britain it was decided that aircraft production would be splintered into pieces of industry that were scattered across Britian which would serve to lower losses when the factories were targeted. One of the costs of assembling in pieces scattered is that the logistics of moving the pieces so they...

Why was the Fender Rose Wood Telecaster the only guitar George Harrison hated?

 Why was the Fender Rose Wood Telecaster the only guitar George Harrison hated?

This indeed seems to be a question which has some irony built into it. George Harrison was given a Fender Rose Wood Telecaster in 1967 as a gift by Fender. His guitar would become iconic as it would make it’s way into the ‘Let it be’ video as well as it was used for their last public performance.

So iconic is that guitar, that Fender decided to do a George Harrison Tele release and my good God is it a gorgeous guitar, yet; George only kept it for around a year as he would give it away in 1969. Ultimately the reason why he gave it away was because of the weight of the guitar. Being a solid body the guitar weighed a ton and he found it too much weight on the straps for it to be comfortable.

The person that George gave the guitar to would hold onto it until 2 years after George’s death. His widow would buy the guitar for under a half million.

Still, despite George only owning the guitar for a year it made its way into two very important moments in history and as such, Fender find this Telecaster to be really unique with the layout of the pickups. The bridge pickup is quite literally in the bridge and unit's a single coil angled pickup complimented by a single coil neck pickup.

The neck pickup is a standard ’67 telecaster single coil and the bridge appears to be the ’64 model. These pickups are just the standard telecaster single coil so there is nothing special added additionally.

What is interesting is that Fender took the original complaint that George had with the guitar and they addressed it within the construction of this reissue. Fender hollowed out the guitar to make it lighter but, in doing so they left a ton of room for modding the guitar into whatever configuration you would like as there is tons of room for wiring and coils.

The construction of the body has two rosewood slabs separated by a slice of maple which gives the guitar a unique look. You can see the white of the maple slice when looking at the guitar from the sides.

The wiring is standard Telecaster wiring with 250K pots, a 3 way switch, and the knobs on this unit are just knobs - they don’t push/pull to go in and out of phase or anything like that.

The body has even more hollowing than what meets the eye as there is literally a giant U that is not visible which is hollowed out from the top going down the length wrapping around the bridge and going back up the other side to the electronics as indicated by the blue marker..

The neck is two slabs of rosewood glued together. It appears that its’ one piece but it’s not. The fretboard itself is glued onto the neck but it’s hard to see so it still looks very cool.. The neck is the late 60s C neck and it has 21 jumbo sized frets.

The guitar weighs 7 lbs. 8 oz. You can check out the sound in the video below. The sound is a bit thin but it’s nice and crisp. The guy doing the demo has some complaints about the tone but, it sounds really good to me.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is the Most Dangerous Situation You Ever Willfully Put Yourself Into?

  What is the Most Dangerous Situation You Ever Willfully Put Yourself Into? Photo by  Vincentiu Solomon  on  Unsplash I parachuted in behind enemy lines for what would turn out to be a near suicide mission. As soon as I landed I could see that the enemy was everywhere. I immediately began to look for cover to assess the situation. At first I was greeted by an eerie silence but then suddenly out of the blue I heard this blood curdling battle cry, which I could tell instantly it was the enemy. If these people found me I feared it would mean certain death, little did I know what I had coming in my future. I quickly found myself some cover and slid up tight between this green gawdy plant thing and what I could only assume was a tree or something as it was extremely hard and immovable. I never took the time to analyze it. Instead, I pressed up against it as tight as I could and I depended on the shadows to conceal what the tree and the plant thing had left in the open. O...

Why do you think that the US could lose it’s top position as a world leader?

  Why do you think that the US could lose it’s top position as a world leader? Photo by Kenny Eliason on Unsplash Sadly, some of the things you have been saying are good assessments of the situation and I believe there is credibility there for why the US is on a down spiral. #1) The Russians figured something out quite a while ago and they ran an experiment in the US in 2016 to see if it was true. People go up in arms that it was to mess with the election and yes, it was partly but that wasn’t the point in itself. By getting that hacker team to focus on the US they were able to spread disinformation and sow seeds of discord that had incalculable effects moving forwards. That hacker group a) showed the world that the US was vulnerable b) it showed that democracy has some major weaknesses that can be exploited c) it showed the threat of total free speech and free speech of the press d) it made the American electoral system seem fraudulent, or at very least not a credible and fa...

What are the potential drawbacks of nationalizing an industry?

 What are the potential drawbacks of nationalizing an industry? It depends on what industry and what the purpose of nationalizing it is. The industries that it makes the most sense to nationalize have some criteria in my opinion: They should be static industries that do not change very much or very quickly in terms of the core of it’s business. It should be an industry that is key to public security, public safety, or the public’s interest. It should be something that is mammoth in size so that it doesn’t affect any small businesses by having it nationalized. It should add value by nationalizing it - such as continuity, consistency, stability etc. There should be a pain point that is needing to be addressed that centralizing that industry under the government addresses it. It should be specialized enough that there is not a lot of competition. It wouldn’t be small business or medium businesses getting put out of business - it should be an industry where it would be cost prohibitive...